2007 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited by carreviewsandnews.com
Read the full review at http://carreviewsandnews.com . See large pictures, videos of the interior and exterior, and get invoice pricing as well as comparisons to other models.
Duration : 0:1:13
- » Continue reading or Comments (8)
MW 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer Road Test2007 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited – First Drive – Car and Driver
Larry Webster discusses the 2007 Jeep Wrangler model range.
2007 Jeep Wrangler and Wrangler Unlimited – First Drive Review – http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/hot_lists/high_performance/off_roaders_boulder_bashers/2007_jeep_wrangler_and_wrangler_unlimited_first_drive_review?cid=95
2007 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon – Road Test – http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/hot_lists/car_shopping/small_suvs/2007_jeep_wrangler_unlimited_rubicon_road_test?cid=95
Duration : 0:2:14
- » Continue reading or Comments (21)
C&D 1999: Jeep Grand Cherokee Road TestCrash Test 1997 – 2006 Jeep Wrangler ( Front & Side ) IIHS
Jeep Wrangler
1997-2006 models
FRONTAL OFFSET TEST
OVERALL EVALUATION: Acceptable
Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics
Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right
Acceptable Good Good Acceptable Good Acceptable
Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.
Test details:
The Jeep Wrangler was redesigned for the 1997 model year.
Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was reasonably well controlled. After the dummy moved forward into the airbag, it leaned toward the driver door. Its head and left shoulder moved outside the door because the doors on the soft-top model tested aren’t high enough for optimal restraint.
Injury measures — Measures taken from the head, neck, and chest indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the left femur indicate that injuries to the upper leg would be possible.
Jeep Wrangler
1997-2006 models
SIDE IMPACT TEST NO SIDE AIRBAGS AVAILABLE
OVERALL EVALUATION: Marginal
Injury measures Head protection Structure/safety cage
Head/neck Torso Pelvis/leg
Driver Acceptable Poor Good Marginal Good
Rear passenger Good Good Good Marginal
Important: Side impact crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle type and weight categories.
Test details:
The Jeep Wrangler was redesigned for the 1997 model year.
Injury measures:
Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries would be likely in a crash of this severity. Serious neck injuries also would be possible. In addition, loading to the shoulder was excessive.
Rear passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
Head protection:
Driver — The dummy’s head was hit by the window sill of the driver door. This impact did not produce high head injury measures, but the head protection is inadequate.
Rear passenger — The dummy’s head was hit by the by the diagonal steel tube supporting the convertible top. This impact did not produce high head injury measures, but the head protection is inadequate.
Duration : 0:0:49
- » Continue reading or Comments (25)
Crash Test 1997 – 2006 Jeep Wrangler ( Front & Side ) IIHS
Jeep Wrangler
1997-2006 models
FRONTAL OFFSET TEST
OVERALL EVALUATION: Acceptable
Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics
Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right
Acceptable Good Good Acceptable Good Acceptable
Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.
Test details:
The Jeep Wrangler was redesigned for the 1997 model year.
Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was reasonably well controlled. After the dummy moved forward into the airbag, it leaned toward the driver door. Its head and left shoulder moved outside the door because the doors on the soft-top model tested aren’t high enough for optimal restraint.
Injury measures — Measures taken from the head, neck, and chest indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the left femur indicate that injuries to the upper leg would be possible.
Jeep Wrangler
1997-2006 models
SIDE IMPACT TEST NO SIDE AIRBAGS AVAILABLE
OVERALL EVALUATION: Marginal
Injury measures Head protection Structure/safety cage
Head/neck Torso Pelvis/leg
Driver Acceptable Poor Good Marginal Good
Rear passenger Good Good Good Marginal
Important: Side impact crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle type and weight categories.
Test details:
The Jeep Wrangler was redesigned for the 1997 model year.
Injury measures:
Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries would be likely in a crash of this severity. Serious neck injuries also would be possible. In addition, loading to the shoulder was excessive.
Rear passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
Head protection:
Driver — The dummy’s head was hit by the window sill of the driver door. This impact did not produce high head injury measures, but the head protection is inadequate.
Rear passenger — The dummy’s head was hit by the by the diagonal steel tube supporting the convertible top. This impact did not produce high head injury measures, but the head protection is inadequate.
Duration : 0:0:49
- » Continue reading or Comments (25)
99 Jeep Wrangler Sport
Virtual testdrive of a 1999 Jeep Wrangler Sport for sale on eBay. See www.mountainautosport.com for more info!
Duration : 0:7:50
- » Continue reading or Comments (0)